THE MURDER OF THE ROSENBERGS
"Ethel
was murdered, you can't put it any other way." --Walter Schneir.
"We didn't want them to die, we
wanted them to talk.” --Robert J. Lamphere, FBI, Espionage Section.
Interesting quotes; and now, decades later, after the McCarthy witch
hunts (which were given credibility in the eyes of a stunned America by the
execution of the “spies”), and after the end of the cold war, let us look at
the facts. To quote Sargent Joe Friday,
of the television series Dragnet: “Only
the facts, ma’am.”
Julius Rosenberg, an electrical engineer, and his wife Ethel, the
mother of two young children, were executed at Sing Sing in upstate New York on
the evening of 19 June 1953.
Other than having been born Jewish and living in an era when Jews
were generally linked with Communism as a result of their contribution to the
Spanish Civil war and the struggle for organized Labor, were they really guilty
of anything else, or were they a convenient scapegoat used to throw the blame
on people other than the real traitors, who to this day are protected by a
grateful Government; people too trusted and famous ever to be revealed for what
they were?
The Rosenberg lawyer, Emmanuel Bloch was unable to persuade a single
atomic scientist to testify to the limited significance of Julius's atomic espionage.
The sketches that allegedly held the bomb secrets Julius allegedly received
from his brother-in-law David Greenglass and delivered to his Soviet controller
were never made public. Not once during the trial nor afterward was the
prosecution required to show the actual connection between that information and
the Soviet bomb.
Among the most useful of Stalin's nuclear recruits was Theodore Hall,
an American biophysicist who gave away the bomb. Hall, who worked at Los Alamos
with Klaus Fuchs, provided the Soviets with information vital to the success of
their bomb program. Hall justified his deed by claiming he'd been troubled by
the prospect of an American atomic weapon monopoly, that at the time the
Americans and the Soviets were allies in the war against Hitler, and that the
Soviets had saved the West from defeat.
Hall, strangely enough, was questioned but never put on trial or sent
to prison!
Joan Hall, Theodore Hall's wife, remembered the evening of the
Rosenberg executions: "We followed the case, but we weren't in a
position to do anything at that time. Ted still had his links with the network.
There was no question of our participating in any of the clemency movement or
whatever was going on. So we watched from the sidelines in horror... That
evening we had been invited to an evening gathering at the home of a colleague
of Ted's in Westchester. We were driving up from Queens where we lived. The
road took us parallel to the Hudson River past Ossining, the town where Sing-Sing
Prison is. It was eight o'clock, and as we drove by the sun was setting. It was
red, and it was large over the river going down. I absent-mindedly switched on
the radio and, believe it or not, they were broadcasting the last movement of
Mahler's Ninth Symphony, a farewell symphony, which is some of the most sad,
heartbreaking music that exists. It was a symphony that Ted and I were both
very familiar with... So we rode along listening to Mahler and watching the sun
go down and feeling indescribable. We didn't say anything, not a word. We got
to our colleague's house and did what people have to do in gatherings like
that, then went home...Of course, we were thinking, God, that could have been
us..."
Shiner asserts that Ethel Rosenberg was not a Soviet spy, and
also that her husband Julius did not receive bomb lens mold sketches from David
Greenglass, who'd been employed while in the army at Los Alamos. He further asserts that if anyone was guilty
of stealing atom bomb secrets it was David Greenglass, Ethel's brother.
Invitation to an Inquest ( Schneir, Walter (1983). Invitation to an Inquest. Pantheon Books ISBN 0-394-71496-2.)
In February 1950, Klaus Fuchs was arrested in London, England.
Charged with espionage he gave up his courier Harry Gold. Gold was arrested on
23 May, 1950, his FBI statement led the agency to David Greenglass who was
taken into custody 16 June, 1950, Julius Rosenberg a month later, Ethel a month
after that.
The key element in the prosecution's case was an alleged meeting in
the Rosenberg apartment on an afternoon in September 1945. Ethel was supposed
to have sat down at a Remington portable machine and typed out a twelve-page
report on the bomb supplied to her by her brother. Walter Schneir maintains
that the meeting never took place. Julius had lost his army-related job a few
months before the alleged meeting and his Soviet spymasters had suspended his
activity on their behalf.
According to Elizabeth Bentley, an American agent who turned herself
in to the FBI in 1945, Julius was a key figure in a cell of engineers involved
in industrial espionage. In 1944, the New York Cityrezidentura (the head agent
handler for the NYC area) warned Moscow that perhaps Julius was being
overworked. But this was not for his work on bomb information.
The release in Russia in the late 1990s and early 2000s of once
top-secret documents pertaining to the Soviet atomic project has determined
that the Greenglass-Rosenberg information was of limited value. Igor Kurchatov,
a leading Soviet nuclear scientist, said the material received from David
Greenglass via the Julius Rosenberg network provided at best limited
corroboration of what had already been obtained from Klaus Fuchs and Ted Hall.
A book by Vladimir Lota published in 2002 with the title The GRU and
the Atomic Bomb achieved best-seller status in Russia and was soon followed by a competing
volume, The KGB and the Atomic Bomb In Prof. Lota's determination to ensure the
GRU received maximum credit, he lumped Robert Oppenheimer with Fuchs, and the
Rosenbergs.
(in 2002, Russian historian Vladimir Lota published The GRU and the Atom Bomb.)
Read more:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/Iowa-Born-Soviet-Trained.html#ixzz24eaaTYsZ
“Spies: The Rise and Fall of the K.G.B. in America,” is by John Earl
Haynes, Harvey Klehr and Alexander Vassiliev, a former Soviet espionage
agent. In this book they maintain that:
“For more than half a century, Oppenheimer has been denounced as the most
damaging Soviet spy inside the Manhattan Project or defended as an honorable
man undone by false and politically motivated charges. K.G.B. documents
demonstrate that he was not a spy, although not for lack of K.G.B. effort.”
and he added, “The news that Julius Rosenberg recruited not one atomic spy
but two was a total surprise.”
Julius Rosenberg’s code name was Liberal. That his wife apparently
was not given a covert identity, Mr. Haynes said, was not surprising, because
she was “not active in her own right, but just as an aide to Julius,” he said.
“His wife knows about her husband’s work,” according to Mr.
Vassiliev’s notes from one K.G.B. memo. “She could be used independently,
but should not be overworked — poor health.”
Mr. Vassiliev’s notebooks contain no references to Ethel Rosenberg’s
typing her brother’s notes — the crucial trial evidence against her — but said
“this is a lack of evidence, not negative evidence, simply a lack of
corroboration.”
“The notebooks show that Greenglass delivered more and richer
information about Los Alamos than he later admitted,” Mr. Haynes said.
Mr. Greenglass’s information “was unqualified and far from
polished,” for which agents blamed, in part, his “insufficient
qualifications” — as a machinist, rather than a scientist or engineer. The
authors concluded, though, that he provided “an impressive list of materials
from an Army sergeant with only limited technical education.”
Mr. Greenglass, sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment, was released in
1960. Through his lawyer, he declined to comment on the latest allegations.
In the course of the trial
Julius took the fifth when asked if he was a Party member and insisted on the
couple's total innocence.
While the judge, Irving R.Kaufman and prosecutors Irving Saypol and
Roy Cohn were Jews, not a single Jew was allowed on the jury. Julius Rosenberg
was found guilty, sentenced to death. Ethel Rosenberg was also found guilty,
sentenced to die with her husband. Morton Sobell was found guilty and sentenced
to 30 years. David Greenglass was sentenced to 15 years. The U S Supreme Court
refused to review the Rosenberg case. On 19 June 1953 the court reversed a
last-minute stay of execution.
In a letter dated 16 June 1953, Ethel reminded President Eisenhower
that Nazis had received American mercy. “Today”, she wrote, while she
and her husband languished on death row, "these ghastly mass butchers,
these obscene racists are graciously receiving the benefits of mercy and in
many instances being reinstated in public office."
There is no record of a reply.
In his denial of a petition for Executive Clemency, Eisenhower said
the Rosenbergs's crime “could very well result in the deaths of many, many
thousands of innocent citizens.” On the day of the executions, the number
expanded. The Rosenbergs, he said, "may have condemned to death tens of
millions of innocent people all over the world."
Ike wrote, in a letter to his son David: "... to the
Rosenberg case... in this instance it is the woman who is the strong and
recalcitrant character, the man is the weak one. She has obviously been the
leader in everything they did in the spy ring... if there would be any
commuting of the woman's sentence without the man's then from here on the
Soviets would simply recruit their spies from among women."
Kim Philby, the convicted KGB spy in the highest circles of the English
government maintained that all Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were ever really
guilty of was being small-time couriers, that they had no connection to the key
KGB atomic bomb spies, and further that he never imagined they would be
executed.
A week before the execution the FBI presented their lawyer Emmanuel
Bloch with a list of twenty-five names. If Julius and Ethel affixed their
signatures to the list, branding the men and women on it Soviet spies, the
couple might have been spared. Ethel was little more than a hostage to the
process and died as hostages do when the demands of their captors have been
rejected.
Walter Schneir: "What if Julius and Ethel had confessed?
Could they have escaped execution if they had tried to meet the government
halfway?... My own conclusion is that it would have been difficult, probably
impossible, for them to save themselves. The only sure-fire way would have been
for both, Ethel as well as Julius, to have agreed to everything, including all
the atomic espionage deeds they had never done, and then for Julius to have
testified at trials and Congressional hearings against the very friends he
himself had recruited."
On that Friday evening in June, 1953 with the Shabbat hour approaching,
FBI agents with stenographers standing by were at the scene to hear last minute
confessions. Rabbi Irving Koslowe, the Sing Sing rabbi, attended the
executions. After Julius had been pronounced dead, the rabbi approached Ethel, and
said: "Julius is gone. Do you have any names?" “No”,
she replied, “I have no names”.
There had been was a hasty re-scheduling of the executions to beat
the 8:13 p.m. Shabbat deadline. Julius who went first was pronounced dead at
8:06:45. It turned out Ethel, the executioner’s last client, was harder to
kill. The first attempt at killing Ethel was at 8:11:30. But she needed a
second jolt and wasn't pronounced dead until 8:16, three minutes into the
Sabbath.
So were they guilty of everything they were charged with? The Venona papers (Venona was a top-secret
government operation involving cryptanalysts, linguists and mathematicians who
decoded thousands of intercepted Soviet intelligence cables sent to agents in
the U.S.) were not allowed to be presented at the trial, only paraphrased by
the FBI to explicitly prove the extent of Rosenbergs guilt.
The papers didn’t finger Julius as an atomic spy. Rather, they
identified him as someone engaged in low-level industrial espionage.
The United States government supposedly executed two people for the
reason that they stole the greatest secret known to mankind. The judge said
that they committed a crime worse than murder, and that they caused the Korean War.
President Eisenhower said "I am denying clemency" for
essentially the same reason. That’s why they were executed, and Venona is proof
that neither Julius nor Ethel Rosenberg were sentenced to death for a crime
they never committed.
Not long after the trial, the New York Times reported that Dr. James
Beckerley, the head of the Atomic Energy Commission Classification Office was
not convinced of the extent of their guilt.
“The atom bomb and hydrogen bomb were not stolen from us by spies.”
He said. He went on, “Atom bombs and
hydrogen bombs are not matters that can be stolen and transmitted in the form
of information.”
Dr. Harold Urey testified in a March 3, 1946 congressional hearing
that, "Detailed data on the atomic bomb would require 80 or 90 volumes
of close print which only a scientist or engineer would be able to read."
Henry Linschitz, who helped
assemble the Nagasaki bomb, described Greenglass’s sketches as "garbled"
and "highly incomplete." He concluded that it was "not
possible in any technologically useful way to condense the results of a $2
billion development effort into a diagram, drawn by a high school graduate
machinist on a single sheet of paper."
Previously there had been a major effort on the part of the
government to discredit Jews who had helped so much with labor unions and
scientific research yet this same government had opened the US to NAZI
scientists with Jewish blood on their hands; offering them a home, prestige,
and massive salaries to aid the US to become the dominant world power. By
murdering the Rosenbergs the government suppressed dissidence in the US,
crippled the labor unions, and gaged Hollywood, and opened the door for the
dark days of the McCarthy witch hunt to come.
The last irony in the case came in 2008, when the only surviving
defendant, Morton Sobell, acknowledged that he was a Soviet spy and implicated
Julius Rosenberg in industrial and military spying, but not in atomic espionage.
No comments:
Post a Comment